Ghi Health Insurance - Governor Paterson Budget Cutting Machine

Blighty injury was a serious problem for the British military command during World War I. Faced with the prospect of long tours in the front, soldiers have turned to self-inflicted wounds as a means to return home (Blighty was a word used to describe Great Britain). Much damage was an art form as a need to do enough damage to justify the dismissal without permanently damaging himself. New York, David Paterson, governor of the state is asking state residents to adopt a similar strategy for the commission of a Blighty wound against themselves as part of its plan to cut the budget. Ghi health insurance article.

Paterson's plan involves the overthrow of the scariest ever made participatory budgeting. The new website sponsored by the State Reduce expenditures NY says "New York faces a deficit of 47.0 billion dollars over the next four years - the largest in the history of the state," and calls visitors to "determine how to move forward and implement responsible spending reductions." You will be prompted to use the calculator to balance the budget to determine the functions of the state budget. Of course, there's a catch. Participants are able to adjust spending and not on the revenue side of the budget. So you can cut spending from a number of different areas of the state budget.

The election is brutal. Should we cut school aid and Medicaid? Mental health services or higher education? Transportation or health? Assembly wound Blighty you look in the list. Reductions will be greater when the governor says the budget deficit for this year alone amounts to about $ 12 billion. The real question is what will be cut, but why New Yorkers facing these choices? Why should we pit teachers against transport workers? Nurses opposing counsel? Our security on buses in New York over the education of our children? The answer is that we do not. These are false choices of neoliberalism. Ghi health insurance article.

Missing NY Reduce expenditure site has no mention of the meeting, which took place in early 2008 by Governor Paterson and Columbia University economist Joseph Stiglitz. Stiglitz at the meeting recommended the property tax as the most effective way to close a growing budget deficit NY State. 6% tax on all income over $ 5,000,000 would cover the deficit of about $ 6 billion. Stiglitz favors tax increases, because, he argues that state and local government expenditure provides a more positive economic impact in relation to budget cuts. Implementing a progressive tax structure, higher taxes on capital gains and small tax on financial transactions would more than cover the remaining deficit. Of course, this would mean that New Yorkers to provide "income" side of the budget-balancing calculator!

None of this does not happen by itself. Left to himself, Paterson will continue to trumpet the message of cuts and privatization of essential services, such as non-profit health insurer GHI and hip. Even if he asks for public feedback on the cuts, New Yorkers may see this Blighty "wound scenario. Instead, a self-inflicted wound, we must build a strong movement to defend the services needed for daily life of millions. In this way, New Yorkers refuse to be divided on the basis of job title or heading. No website, no matter how slickly built, to build a consensus on what should be cut in human rights.